this was an issue because it was given to my group and me after we'd edited the first episode, which features a fair bit of swearing. we couldn't re-shoot because we didn't have enough time but what we did was we censored the language out. because we had such little time and rendering the episodes took so long, we missed a few of the censoring which actually made it funny. we all thought it was a disaster, i thought the first episode was terrible compared to what i wanted from it. reasons for that were down to time management and the editor going off on a tangent instead of sticking to the storyboard and group discussions on thoughts and feelings. feedback we recieved however was that people agreed with us on the editing but found the censoring hilarious. anything will make people laugh these days won't it.
Monday, 1 February 2010
evidence from cram creative
this is the letter that was given to the groups from the teachers, who were acting as producers overlooking everything we were doing. this letter is tellijng us that they were interested in showing our work at the junction, live venue, and show them on a professional televiosn web channel. this meant having to take out anything offensive, including lanuage and violence. we also needed to include them in the credits to make it more professional from a glance. 
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment